The Objective : The objective is to determine whether honey or Neosporin have a greater impact on the reduction of bacterial growth.
Methods/Materials
Materials
15 petri dishes divided into thirds, 24 oz. bottle of grade A clover honey, 1 liter of agar, tube of Neosporin Original, 45 cotton swabs, bulb thermometer, medium size Styrofoam cooler, desk lamp, and a 15-watt light bulb.
Method
I conducted three trials of five samples each. I swabbed bacteria onto the agar in my Petri dishes. I then put a drop of honey in one of the sections in each Petri dish and some Neosporin in a different section in each Petri dish. After three days I recorded the results, measuring the amount of bacterial growth within a 4 mm diameter in each of the substances.
Results
I found that within a 4 mm diameter, at the thickest section of both the honey and Neosporin, they both had no bacterial growth.
Conclusions/Discussion
It turned out that both, Neosporin and honey, had no bacterial growth and did a good job preventing bacteria from growing when measured at their thickest parts.
This project tests whether honey or Neosporin have a greater impact on the reduction of bacterial growth.
Science Fair Project done By Jenna R. McMane
<<Back To Topics Page...................................................................................>>Next Topic
Related Projects : External Orange Damage ,Fiddling with Friction ,Got Electrolytes ,Got Mold? ,Got Tears? Get Milk! ,Guitar Comparisons ,Hairy Situation ,Hand Sanitizing vs. Hand Washing ,Healing Power: Past or Present ,Home Is Where the Heartburn Ends